Associate Provost | Institutional Planning, Effectiveness and Accreditation
Director | Institutional Research
Institutional Data Analyst
Institutional Research Specialist
Accreditation assesses the capacity of an institution and its programs to assure quality and to produce evidence that it does so. As an accredited institution, Edison State Community College is expected to have the standards, processes, and the will for quality assurance in depth and throughout our educational offerings and programs that includes a focus on student learning, education, continuous improvement, evidence-based institutional learning, integrity, ethical behavior, institutional sustainability, mission-centeredness and accreditation through peer review. Holding accreditation through the Higher Learning Commission is a privilege that we proudly maintain.
Edison State Community College is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission. The Higher Learning Commission accredits degree-granting post-secondary educational institutions in the North Central region of the United States. Please see the Accreditation page for Edison State Community College accreditation information.
Edison State Community College academic programs that hold accreditation with professional accrediting bodies can be reviewed on the Accreditation page.
Higher Learning Commission is required by the U.S. Department of Education to assure that all of its member institutions are complying with the expectations of specific regulations that accreditors must enforce as a part of their federal recognition. In addition, the Commission is required to review the institution's compliance with its Title IV program responsibilities. Compliance with these requirements by both institutions and the Commission is necessary to ensure that institutions accredited by the Commission are eligible for federal financial aid.
Quality Checkup Report with response to Edison State Community College Federal Compliance.
2014 | Federal Compliance Report
Edison State Community College is currently seeking authorization from other states where instruction is delivered for distance education. Please see the Accreditation page.
Edison State Community College adopted the Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) approach to organizational performance in 2000. In 2001, the College joined the Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) and the Continuous Quality Improvement Network (CQIN). AQIP Action Projects and CQIN Projects lead the campus in innovative initiatives.
The Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) is defined by the
Higher Learning Commission as "A process that infuses the principles and benefits of continuous improvement into the culture of colleges and universities by providing an alternative process through which an already-accredited institution can maintain its accreditation. An institution in AQIP demonstrates how it meets accreditation standards and expectation through a sequence of events that align with the ongoing activities of an institution striving to improve its performance."
Action Projects are meant to focus institutions into working on various action projects and demonstrate their efforts to quality improvement, develop structures necessary to organize and oversee a quality initiative and to drive institutions to engage their faculty and staff in the project selection thus empowering employees. Action Projects are also meant to open the avenues for peer interaction, feedback and review. Current Edison State Community College Action Projects and the status of their progress, can be found by clicking the button below.
Available for Peer ReviewIdentifying and Overcoming Risk Factors That Affect Student Success Review | 2014
Identifying and Overcoming Risk Factors That Affect Student Success Review | 2015
The Academic Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) accreditation pathway runs on an eight-year cycle. More information on the AQIP Pathway can be viewed by clicking the button below.
The Systems Portfolio | Systems Appraisal process is defined by the
Higher Learning Commission as "An opportunity for an institution to get expert, objective, third-party feedback on its strengths and opportunities for improvement every four years. In turn, institutions gain insight in determining the next targets for advancing quality in the institution through Action Projects and other plans." This public document describes fundamental institutional systems that cover the AQIP categories. Each institution publishes a document that contains descriptions of the processes, documented results and improvements. The Edison State Community College Systems Portfolio | Systems Appraisal documents can be viewed by clicking the button below.
Portfolios | Appraisals
Higher Learning Commission is required by the U.S. Department of Education to assure that all of its member institutions are complying with the expectations of specific regulations that accreditors must enforce as a part of their federal recognition. In addition, the Commission is required to review the institution's compliance with its Title IV program responsibilities. Compliance with these requirements by both institutions and the Commission is necessary to ensure that institutions accredited by the Commission are eligible for federal financial aid. Additional information can be found above under Accreditation.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is at the core of our quality thinking. It means that Edison State will continuously evaluate our operations and processes to make them better, focusing on the process rather than the individual. CQI Process Teams apply the Plan|Do|Check|Act cycle of quality improvement and the CQI Steering Committee monitors the results. Any continuous quality improvement journey is long and arduous… it is continuous. Edison State's process management focus supports our efforts to be a stronger, learner-centered college, to encourage a more positive workplace and to be more supportive of each other in an ever-changing higher education environment.
CQI Process Teams are commissioned by the CQI Steering Committee to address college-wide opportunities for improvement. All CQI processes are continually evaluated for cycles of improvement, ownership and subsequent retirement of any process that has been successfully integrated into daily business operations. For more information on the CQI Process Team Policy and Commissioning a CQI Process Team, click on the links below. To request the implementation of a new process team or to revisit a current process, please contact
NOTE Additional resources and CQI documents can be found in
SharePoint. Permission required.
The CQI Steering Committee reviews all CQI processes for cycles of improvement, ownership and/or possible retirement of processes successfully integrated into daily business operations.
The Continuous Quality Improvement Network (CQIN) raises the bar for higher education. The mission of the Continuous Quality Improvement Network is to be a member-driven organization committed to building stronger colleges through learning partnerships. CQIN is focused on being higher education's best resource for continuous improvement through open and honest sharing of information.
Each year, selected members of Edison State Community College, plan and implement a college-wide project based on the Total Quality Management principles and practices as a way of continuously improving the institution. Continuous Quality Improvement Network teams and their projects can be viewed by clicking the button below.
CQIN Teams | Projects
Our commitment to excellence and quality continues and is demonstrated via our applications for state quality awards submitted to The Partnership for Excellence. Edison State Community College received a Silver Level Award in 2011 and 2013, recognizing our commitment to excellence based on the Malcolm Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence.
The Partnership for Excellence Award measures performance in the following areas
Additional information about The Partnership for Excellence is available on their website.
Edison State Community College utilizes a Baldrige-based Employee Satisfaction Survey to evaluate our leadership's performance in providing an understandable mission, guiding values, positive work environment, information sharing, individual career advancement opportunities, prioritization of initiatives and opportunities.
The Employee Satisfaction Survey is figured on a 'positive response' rating where the total of the positive indicators are divided by the total of the positive and negative indicators. 'Neither Agree nor Disagree' responses are not factored in the totals. The results of the most recent survey can be found below.
2017 Employee Satisfaction Results
Has a coworker gone 'above and beyond'? Did someone do, say or provide something that exceeded expectations? Let them know. Give them a 'critter' and then tell us about it and share the good work done by others. Click the button below to tell us your favorite 'critter' tale!
I've Got A 'Critter' Tale
The following individuals have periodic communication with the President. Unresolved concerns may be shared with your representative group to be discussed with the President.
Academic Year 2017 | 2018
Staff Senate | RepresentativesChair Amy Crow
Vice Chair Susan Barth
Secretary Helen Wilcox