Services Entry Banner
  
CQI Steering
Committee

President's
Address
Fall 2003

President's
Address
Fall 2002

President's
Address
Fall 2001

AQIP

Agendas

Discussion

Meetings

Minutes

Process
Improvement
Teams

Dr. Yowell's
CQI e-mail

Criterion 1: Helping Students Learn

MINUTES
FEBRUARY 18, 2003
 

MEMBERS PRESENT: Iden Smith, Becky Telford, Ann Miller, Ruth Barney, and Matha Schleinitz 

The minutes of the February 4 meeting were approved as submitted.

 The online version of the two-hour blackboard training session is already available. This was one of this team’s goals for the third year.

The results of this team’s survey and the evaluations of online classes were discussed. The team agreed with the recommendation that all online and Web flex classes continue to be evaluated. 

The team may meet with the CQI team chaired by Brad Reed to discuss our findings and recommendations.

The knowledge or skills of students taking online or Web flex courses was discussed. It would be ideal to have every student who wants to take an online or Web flex class demonstrate needed computer skills, but there are many practical problems in making it happen. Faculty advisors would need two advising appointments for students wanting to take one of these courses. The first appointment would find out about the student’s desire to take one of these courses and a second appointment would be needed to register the student after he or she has demonstrated the needed skills. Also, students who register through Web Advisor would probably not be required to demonstrate these skills. Brad Reed’s CQI team has been responsible for this issue in the past so this AQIP team will leave it for them.

The results of this Team’ survey of unsuccessful students, the results of the evaluations of online courses, and the first-hand information provided by Applications Services personnel indicate that the biggest issues fall in the general areas of advising/start-up procedures and faculty training.

ADVISING AND START-UP ISSUES
While appropriate information is available, not everyone is aware of it or uses it consistently. Also, different instructors use different procedures for getting their courses started. Some faculty expect the student to make the initial contact while other instructors mail a packet of information to registered students. A student who has gotten a packet for one course may expect it for all online courses. A handout giving information to students registering for online courses is available, but not everyone gets it. Also, students who register online do not get it. Based on these issues, this Team will make the following recommendations:

  • Every student who registers for an online course should be sent a postcard. This postcard would provide them with pertinent information such as what computer equipment they need, that they need to have internet access, and how to make initial contact with the course instructor.
  • Shortly prior to the beginning of registration each term, faculty members should be sent a reminder concerning the issues that should be discussed with a student who wants to register for an online, Web flex, or flex course. This would be sent by e-mail.
  • Faculty members who teach online courses should be asked to follow uniform start-up procedures at the beginning of each term.

FACULTY TRAINING
The quality of online courses is inconsistent. Some of the faculty members who teach these courses have no training in the components of good online instruction. In order to improve the quality of online and Web flex courses this Team will recommend the following:

  • Deans should visit course Blackboard sites just as they visit classrooms to get a feel for the quality of the instruction taking place.
  • A brief document should be created which summarizes some of the components of good online instruction. It would describe the variety of instructional and evaluation methods that can be used. This would be provided to faculty members who will be teaching online and Web flex classes.
  • “Best Practices” workshops for full-time and adjunct faculty should be held during the duty days prior to each term. These workshops would give examples of successful components of online instruction. College staff or outside experts may be used.

The team discussed what data to use to compare success rates in traditional, online and Web flex classes. For every course which has at least one online or Web flex section, we would like the following information:

    1. A listing of all sections of the courses with the section numbers included.
    2. The number students enrolled in each of these sections.
    3. The number of students who earned D, W, FUW, and F grades in each of these sections.

This information will then be put into tables where success rates for sections with different teaching methods can be compared. For each course the table would be like the following:

COURSE:

                        # of      Total #             #D       #W      #FUW #F        Total#              %

                        Sec.     Students                                                           Unsuccessful     Unsuc.

Trad. Sec.

Online Sec.

Web Flex

Overall percentages of unsuccessful students will be calculated for all traditional sections, online sections, and Web flex sections. 

 

 

CQI HOME   PROCESS IMPROVEMENT TEAMS HOME     CQIN
E-mail:

Copyright © 2001-2008 Edison Community College